Runaway Nightmare (1982)

runawaynightmareLife at the Death Valley Insect Ranch — or Worm Ranch, depending on which sub-Kinko’s sign you read — is pretty sweet for heterosexual live-in pals Jason and Ralph. Respectively played by Sole Survivor’s Al Valletta and Pets’ Mike Cartel (also this film’s writer/director/editor), the guys are enjoying a day of drinking beer, shooting guns and wearing denim when they see something unusual in the distance. Moseying over to investigate, they discover a freshly dug grave containing a beautiful blonde woman nude in a coffin, but still possessing a pulse. (If only she could lend that to the script.)

Because Ralph and Jason are stand-up guys, they aim to do the right thing; unfortunately, before they get the chance, they are kidnapped by a gang of women and held against their will at the ladies’ secluded compound. With names like Torchy, Pepper and Vampire, these tough gals would radiate the fight-’em-or-fuck-’em nature of the classic Russ Meyer vixen, if Cartel had given them personalities, not to mention distinguishing traits beyond the obvious “the fat one.” Forcing the assistance of Jason and Ralph, the abductors plot revenge for their buried-alive sister via stealing a suitcase of plutonium from their enemies’ carefully guarded warehouse.

runawaynightmare1Let me be clear: Despite that case and its radioactive contents, Runaway Nightmare is no Kiss Me Deadly. Whereas Robert Aldrich’s 1955 noir classic concerned private detective Mike Hammer, this indie centers around two guys as dumb as a box of hammers.

Apparently considering himself quite the wisecracker, Cartel wrote himself a stream of one-liners neither humorous nor appropriate for the situation or established tone. If viewers do laugh, it will be for inadvertent reasons — namely, painful silences and lines delivered so awkwardly, they barely resemble how we as humans speak. A perfect example of Nightmare‘s mix of debilitated pacing and stunted attempts at comic relief can be found in a brief exchange between Ralph and one of his captors:

Woman: “Hey, I’m trying to communicate! I’m into sunshine, awareness, good karma, vibes and witchcraft.”
Ralph: “Well … we do have a lot in common.”
Woman: “I’d like to mix our blood.”

All that bit lacks is Jo Anne Worley popping through a trapdoor just long enough to mug at the camera and say, “Sock it to me!”

Suspense? Only if you care how high the score will go on a pinball machine played midway through the picture. Cartel takes his setup — one of “Dear Penthouse Forum, I never thought it would happen to me …” — to nowhere particularly intriguing, yet the movie finishes as mildly likable for its substantial deficiencies. It’s like a shaggy dog you wouldn’t mind having around, if only it were trained to stop licking your skin and dirty-pawing at your just-pressed pants. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

H.G. Wells’ The Shape of Things to Come (1979)

shapeofthingsAfter Star Wars changed the world, each part of that world wanted its own Star Wars. Italy cooked up Starcrash; Japan produced Message from Space; and Canada clocked in with H.G. Wells’ The Shape of Things to Come. Quite a mouthful, eh? Based in name only on Wells’ 1933 speculative novel, Shape is an all-around square effort (under)funded by schlock specialist Harry Alan Towers (Five Golden Dragons) and directed by Frogs’ George McCowan.

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away On the tomorrow after tomorrow, according to the opening crawl, people fled Earth after the robot wars left it polluted, and colonized the moon. It also tells us that we are dependent upon the miracle drug RADIC-Q-2, which is produced only on the distant planet Delta III.

shapeofthings1In and of itself, that is not necessarily a bad thing; the situation changes when Delta III ruler Omus (Jack Palance, Tango & Cash) decides to withhold 100 percent of the drug’s supply in order to blackmail the moon’s New Washington into making him supreme commander of the moon and Earth. Clad in a cape that makes Palance’s character look like an AARP-sponsored superhero (superpower: craps bigger’n you), he’s basically Big Pharma price hijacker Martin Shkreli. (Given that Shkreli was negative 4 years old at the time, the film indeed predicted Things to Come. Mind, consider yourself blown.)

Powered by dated Honeywell computers, the senators of New Washington negotiate neither with terrorists nor past-their-prime matinee idols in the nadir phase of their career, so whereas viewers may expect a war among the stars, the battle instead is waged — per Towers’ iron grip on the pocketbook — on the farm pasture of Québec. Among those fighting the good fight against Omus and his boxy, walking robots with arms constructed from shop-vac hoses: The Dead Zone’s Nicholas Campbell, The Boogens’ Anne Marie-Martin (her hair lively with considerable, just-been-conditioned bounce) and The Poseidon Adventure’s Carol Lynley.

Effects for this sagging space saga run the spectrum, from quite nifty to rather embarrassing. Budgetary woes weep loudest in the practical settings and costuming, particularly spinning pound-cake pans used as a torture device and protective helmets that are nothing more than inflated plastic bags placed over the actors’ heads — both examples fine for Saturday-matinee fare of the ’50s, but hopelessly out-of-touch by the high-bar standards of the George Lucas generation. Perhaps worst of all, The Shape of Things to Come fails to connect narratively; if Towers jettisoned everything from the book but Wells’ title, why settle for a tale of politics? For every minute that limps by, those robot wars of the aforementioned crawl sound all the more appealing. What we were given can be summarized by a line uttered by Campbell after experiencing Shape’s no-frills version of 2001’s famed stargate sequence: “What the hell was that all about?” —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

It Came from the 80s!: Interviews with 124 Cult Filmmakers

itcamefrom80sAs any child of the 1980s will tell you, the video store was an essential part of growing up. You discovered movies in a manner Netflix and other streaming services cannot replicate: by browsing boxes. And because you paid per movie, you actually watched them — actively, not “second-screen” passively — thus giving them a fairer shot than any click-happy finger does today under the all-you-can-eat model. As a result, you discovered some gems. They may not all have been “good,” but gems nonetheless.

If you thought it was a wild time to feed the VHS monkey with cassettes like Parasite, Slave Girls from Beyond Infinity and Cavegirl, imagine how much wilder it was to make them. Better yet, consume the concrete evidence that is It Came from the 80s!: Interviews with 124 Cult Filmmakers, the debut book from Italy-based film scholar Francesco Borseti. Published by McFarland & Company, it shares the behind-the-scenes drama of 28 low-budget features — stories that never have been revealed before, mostly because no one ever cared to ask.

Thank the rewind gods that he did, because Borseti often ends up with gold. The experience of reading — and watching the flicks themselves — can be summed up by three quotes, which I present to you with no further context:
1. “He wanted to direct and star in the film and do everything. But he did not know how to write, direct, or produce.”
2. “He will be shooting his own horror feature entitled Demonic Aborted Sewer Fecal Fetuses Revenge. If a script I wrote inspired someone to be creative, yes, that’s worth something.”
3. “He was an alcoholic, and he lost his pants just before he was due on camera.”

sororitybabesIt Came from the 80s! isn’t “written” so much as transcribed or perhaps even copy/pasted, as many interviews were conducted through email. Not among the 124 subjects, oddly enough, is director David DeCoteau, who seems like he’d pick up your dry cleaning for $10, and is repped here by a pair of his early pictures, Creepozoids and Sorority Babes in the Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama. His name is constantly dropped, as is Charles Band’s — an anecdotal trend throughout, rivaled only by suspected mob ties, directors taking undeserved credits and the number of porno filmmakers trying to go legit using straight-to-video horror and sci-fi as their express pass into the mainstream.

Included among the book’s 300 pages are such tantalizing tales as:
• how the AIDS epidemic affected the title of Blue Monkey, through three differing accounts;
• the dilemma of whether to get erect or not during the shooting of The Carpenter’s sex scenes;
• the infamous producer Harry Alan Towers‘ habits of visiting high-class hookers and bouncing checks to his screenwriters;
• Anthony Franciosa having to read his Zombie Death House lines off bread loaves;
• Dan Haggerty’s drunken rants between takes of The Chilling;
• how Roger Corman’s Gremlins-“inspired” Munchies can be used as leverage to score pot in Hawaii;
• and how crew members of Terror Night (aka Bloody Movie), while shooting at an actual nunnery, had to keep nuns from walking in on a sex scene between Michelle Bauer and actor Jimi Elwell, who claims the following: “I remember she was sitting on my face and then sliding down to my crotch. After the second or third take, I looked down at my chest and seeing a trail of female juice, I said to her, ‘Nice snail trail, you’re having fun!'”

Much more fun is to be had. Borseti could have done a better job in editing the conversations of the few people who are so long-winded, they venture into unrelated tangents. For example, I don’t care what the director of Deadly Intruder thinks about our nation’s health care system. I do care, however — and deeply — about Elizabeth Foxx’s memories making the T&A romp School Spirit; it’s just a shame the actress is not among those weighing in on that invisible-boy sex comedy. And that’s really my only complaint. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

Star Trek at 50: Still Relevant

startrekbeyondDave Marinaccio is the best-selling author of All I Really Need to Know I Learned from Watching Star Trek. Published in 1994 and still in print, the book is drawn from his long career in the advertising business. Here, as the franchise celebrates its 50th anniversary on Sept. 8, Marinaccio discusses 10 important lessons the venerable sci-fi series of movies and television has taught him.

The 50th anniversary of the launch of Star Trek is this September. Fifty years after William Shatner made his first “captain’s log,” the power of Star Trek is felt across generations. Just this summer, the 13th Star Trek movie was released and has grossed over $231 million to date. It’s pretty clear: Star Trek is here to stay.

So what is it about Star Trek that captures the hearts of millions of people, decade after decade?

Continue reading Star Trek at 50: Still Relevant

Demonoid (1981)

demonoidWhat’s an upstanding British chap like Mark Baines (Roy Jenson, Soylent Green) doing in a place like Guanajuato, Mexico? To strike it rich through plundered oil! But when the superstitious locals he’s hired refuse to enter the mine in question, he goes in himself, with wife Jennifer (Samantha Eggar, The Uncanny) in tow. Inside, they find dusty mummies and a hidden slide that deposits its unsuspecting riders into Satan’s chamber, where a 300-year-old hand is swiped as some sort of prize — the archaeological equivalent to finding a plastic kazoo in a cereal box.

The Baineses know they’ve found something special; what they don’t know is that the crispy claw has a mind of its own. However, unlike the Addams Family member named Thing or yesteryear’s animated Yellow Pages logo, the Guanajuato hand is neither nimble nor evolved enough to run along its fingers. What it lacks in speed, it makes up for in slaughter. Ergo, Demonoid, Alfredo Zacarías’ follow-up to 1978’s The Bees.

demonoid1For phalanges-based horror, Demonoid is markedly better than Oliver Stone’s The Hand, which came out the same year. Both films involve a disembodied mitt killing people, but only Zacarías’ picture can boast Stuart Whitman (Guyana: Cult of the Damned) co-starring as a priest. Trust me: Watching a panicked Whitman stumble about the room with a supernatural paw clutching his face is Something to See. (Perhaps those of you with the DTs have seen it before.)

The swift, schlock shocker is Eggar’s show and she goes to town with it like an ol’ pro. Never is this more apparent than the real sour apple of a surprise ending. I’m sure she felt like a idiot doing it — and a dumber one when she watched the dailies — but Eggar sells it, making that final scene truly memorable, even if the whole of Demonoid is so, so not. Folks, let’s give her a big … well, you fill in the blank. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

Random Genre & Cult Movie Reviews