Reading Material: 3 New Entertainment Titles from McFarland

columbianoirAccording to Gene Blottner in Columbia Noir: A Complete Filmography, 1940-1962, the Columbia Pictures studio proceeded with caution when it came to making noir pictures. Nonetheless, it eventually produced some of the genre’s all-time classics: The Lady from Shanghai, Experiment in Terror, Anatomy of a Murder, On the Waterfront and Gilda (poster art from which adorns the McFarland & Company paperback’s cover). Each of these and 164 other films — revered to forgotten — gets its own entry, so why isn’t Blottner’s book more interesting? Honestly, it suffers from the same drawbacks as Ronald Schwartz’s recent Houses of Noir: Dark Visions from Thirteen Film Studios, from the same publisher: There’s too little substance. More ink is given to beat-by-beat plot summaries and complete cast listings than anything that passes for commentary and criticism. And in covering a single studio’s output, it’s even too niche to work well as reference material. I didn’t dislike it so much as I didn’t get anything from it.

copshowsFrom Dragnet to Justified, Cop Shows: A Critical History of Police Dramas on Television gives 19 mini-histories of some of the tube’s all-time greatest series of the men and women (but mostly men) behind the badge. Written largely by Roger Sabin, with assists from Ronald Wilson, Linda Speidel, Brian Faucette and Ben Bethell, the trade paperback proves a fun read for Gen X-ers who grew up on the 1970s prime-time powerhouses — both live and in reruns — and then played as the characters throughout the neighborhood (um, not that I’m speaking from experience), as a bulk of the contents covers that era forward. Although the collection could be read cover to cover, I found it worked best for me by skipping around, based on which programs I either liked the most or wanted to learn more about. Of particular note are Sabin’s chapter on CSI: Crime Scene Investigation and Fawcett’s on Miami Vice, reminding us how revolutionary these programs are and were. Speaking of the R word, one wishes Sabin and company would have involved the insight of their subjects’ creators, à la Alan Sepinwall’s The Revolution Was Televised; this’ll do for true police-tube aficionados, even if it is by no means essential. (One also wishes McFarland had found stock photography for the cover that wasn’t embarrassing.)

monstrouschildrenKids: Can’t live with ’em, can’t kill ’em! Paraphrased old joke aside, the big screen has served as home to plenty of bad seeds, many of whom have met their demise by the hands of had-it-up-to-here adults, and Markus P.J. Bohlmann and Sean Moreland have edited an entire book on the subject, Monstrous Children and Childish Monsters: Essays on Cinema’s Holy Terrors. As you’d expect, most of the 15 chapters explore examples from the horror genre — Rosemary’s Baby, The Shining, It’s Alive, Orphan and other arguments for birth control — but not wholly; one of the most memorable pieces is Debbie Olson’s live-wire takedown of the Oscar-anointed Precious for “its validation … of the monstrousness of the black female.” Other less-obvious suspects include the chicken baby of Eraserhead, an obscure Beowulf adaptation few have seen and the entirety of Ridley Scott’s CV. (What, no chapter on John Ritter’s Problem Child trilogy?) Variety is the spice of life for this collection; just expect the bun to come out of the oven more academic in tone than its title suggests. —Rod Lott

Get them at Amazon.

The Unliving (2004)

unlivingOfficially or not, The Unliving (aka Tomb of the Werewolf, in a shorter cut) is the 12th and final entry in the cycle of films starring Spanish-horror icon Paul Naschy as the lycanthropic Count Waldemar Daninsky. We say “or not” because Naschy neither wrote nor directed it. Hell — and this is not a complaint — he’s hardly in it!

In the creative mitts of B-movie auteur Fred Olen Ray (Bikini Drive-In), the sequel is also the only one of the wild bunch — among them, The Werewolf vs. the Vampire Woman and Frankenstein’s Bloody Terror — to be most interested in a bodily fluid that’s not colored red.

unliving1In present day, sole Waldemar descendant Richard Daninsky (Jay Richardson, Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers) is anxious to find the treasure rumored to be buried in the count’s castle. To do so, he hires a psychic investigator (Stephanie Bentley, Rapid Eye Movement) and, to document it all, the crew of the investigative TV series Current Mysteries, whose host (Ulli Lommel regular Danielle Petty, Diary of a Cannibal) is slappin’ skin with her himbo producer (Leland Jay, reunited with Olen Ray after 2003’s Bikini Airways).

Unbeknownst to all, the caretaker of the Daninsky castle is actually 17th-century blood-bather Countess Elizabeth Bathory (Michelle Bauer, Evil Toons). Down in its catacombs, she tricks Richard into reviving Waldemar’s skeletal corpse, thus kick-starting a reign of nighttime terror throughout the village as the ol’ count goes loco in werewolf form.

Then five years away from death, Naschy appears awfully (and sadly) frail and slow. The poor guy can’t catch a break onscreen, either, because when he’s not sporting a horrid mullet that makes him look like a pudgier version of Dante from Clerks, he’s hidden behind a five-and-dime werewolf mask seemingly borrowed from a box in Michael Landon’s garage. (I Was a Late-in-Life Werewolf, anyone?) Naturally, when the hirsute creature runs around, it’s not Naschy doing the running.

That Naschy appears in The Unliving at all is reason enough for his fans to watch, although they should temper their expectations that this Daninsky outing feels like it tonally belongs with the others; it does not. As anyone familiar with the Olen Ray oeuvre knows, pure horror is not his thing; intentionally campy homages to pure horror are. Disembowelments are present, but they clearly take a backseat to four- and five-minute sex scenes. Fred’s films are parties, and only certain people fit in. To be one of them, know before crossing the threshold that he keeps the budgets low, the atmosphere light and the ladies’ chests ample and gelatinous. —Rod Lott

Buy it at Amazon.

Misogynist (2013)

misogynistWTFNot every movie dares open with a quote from 18th-century moralist Samuel Johnson. (Then again, I don’t watch the History channel.) Michael Matteo Rossi’s Misogynist does, with this: “Men know that women are an overmatch for them, and therefore, they choose the weakest or the most ignorant.” The next 77 minutes set out to prove the theory. And frickin’ how!

Heartbroken Harrison (Jonathan Bennett, Mean Girls) is crying over a Dear John letter when who should walk on by but smooth-talking mystery man Trevor (Jon Briddell, Midnight Movie), who dismisses the missive as “typical bullshit a woman would say.” With the flip of a business card, he advises Harrison, “All you need is conditioning.”

misogynist1Three years and one title card later, Harrison is under Trevor’s employ, rounding up soul-crushed dude-bros to whom Trev can espouse his brand of female-hating “conditioning.” (Harrison must be terrible at his job, because the audience can be counted on one hand.) A sample of Trevor’s vindictive venom: “All woman are exactly the same. Every woman … wants to get fucked. All woman want to be hurt. They love that sting. All women want to be controlled. And I’m here to teach you how to control.”

Although this two-bit Frank T. Mackey (Tom Cruise’s character in Magnolia) is the most chauvinistic of the bunch, the film is less his story than about the effects of his teachings — specifically, how years of ingesting hate speech takes a toll on Harrison as he enters into holy matrimony. (Marital advice from the boss: “Fuck her before she fucks you.”) That his fiancée, April (Danielle Lozeau, Werewolf Rising), would choose a life with Harrison given his résumé when she is devout to a virginity-intact degree is but one boulder of incredulity along Rossi’s road. Their honeymoon scene, just post-consummation, is set up as Misogynist’s emotional climax, yet feels like warmed-up leftovers from a high school playwrights’ competition. Unfortunately, most of the movie does.

Operating on a higher plane than his castmates, Briddell unequivocally commits to portraying the hateful, unpleasant, despicable Trevor (“Chow down on my cock. I didn’t unzip it to feel a breeze”). Yet the movie overflows with hateful, unpleasant, despicable characters; not even April is patchable for viewer sympathy.

In fact, until the out-of-place “where are they now?” coda, I was unable to tell whether writer/director/producer Rossi was decrying or enabling the very behavior his actors depict without filters. In more skilled hands, the intent would be clear; when it is not, the ending — indeed, the film’s purpose — simply does not deliver the message it believes it has. Misogynist isn’t so bad to stir up ill will — just indifference. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

Shutter (2008)

shutterWhile watching movies for review, I often take notes on my iPhone, as I did for Shutter. Tellingly, the device infamous for incorrect autocorrections wanted to change “Shutter” to “Shitter.” Given that “shutter” is a legitimate word, I can’t explain the switcheroo; perhaps, as in this film, otherworldly forces beyond our understanding were trying to tell me something.

Shutter, shitter: It fits. Shudder.

Newlyweds Ben and Jane Shaw (The Skulls’ Joshua Jackson and Transformers’ Rachael Taylor, respectively) move from the U.S. to Japan for his new job as a fashion photographer. Driving late at night to their new digs, Jane runs over a young Asian woman who suddenly appears in the middle of the road, then loses control of the vehicle and plows into a tree. Both Shaws emerge with only minor scrapes; the woman is nowhere to be found, nor is blood, let alone any trace of her to suggest she existed as nothing more than a figment of Jane’s weary imagination.

SH-5166RIf so, that’s some imagination, because subsequent photos taken of and/or by Jane develop with inexplicable smears of white. Ben’s assistant refers to them as “spirits,” so to whom should Jane turn for counsel? Why, Tokyo’s own “spirit-photography magazine,” of course! (Want more unbelievability? The publication appears to have a paid staff of 10.) What do these spirits start to do? Kill people, of course!

A remake of the 2004 Thai film of the same name, Shutter exists as one of many substandard Americanizations of Asian horrors — Dark Water, Pulse, One Missed Call — that smothered our multiplexes in the aughts, following the wave created by The Ring and The Grudge. In keeping with those films, director Masayuki Ochiai (Infection) gives Shutter’s story space to breathe. That is a nice way of saying it’s slow. But a slow burn, it is not. Unworthy of its slight time investment, it is a humorless piffle that checks off the boxes with duty and without enthusiasm.

Only at the denouement does the movie break from its sleepiness long enough to convey a jolt. I’ve yet to conclude if that twist is truly clever or utterly ridiculous; then again, I stopped thinking about it the next morning — already several more hours than the whole deserves. —Rod Lott

Buy it at Amazon.

Non-Stop (2014)

NST_31_5_Promo_4C_4F.inddAt least at press time, Non-Stop stands as the second of three collaborations between Liam Neeson and director Jaume Collet-Serra; 2011’s Unknown and 2015’s Run All Night are the others. The streak running through this thriller triumvirate? Vanilla flavoring.

On a New York flight of 150 passengers bound for London, air marshal Bill Marks (Neeson) temporarily has to shelve his ongoing love affair with booze — oh, sweet booze! — when, halfway over the Atlantic Ocean, he receives a series of threatening text messages on his supposedly secured-line phone. They aren’t your everyday threatening texts, either, like “OMG ur so fat” or “imma block u on instagram” or “saw yr mom on tinder #gonnahitdat!” Nope, these digi-missives are of the stop-the-presses, sound-the-alarms, batten-down-the-hatches variety: from a terrorist! Maybe even — gulp! — terrorists, plural!

nonstop1With each superimposed onscreen in a gimmick that quickly grows old from sheer overuse, the texts warn that if a million bucks per passenger — that’s $150 million total for those of you not paying attention and/or with appalling multiplication skills — isn’t wired to an account within 20 minutes … well, the passenger count goes down to 149. Repeat for every 20 minutes thereafter. Making things worse, said account is in Bill’s name, meaning that whoever is pulling the scheme’s strings has framed the marshal for hijacking.

Simple enough, right? As a federal agent barks over the phone to our — hic! — sexagenarian hero, “We will not negotiate with terrorists,” and they think that’s you, Billy Boy! Neeson has played this part so often, with only slight variations, since his career resurgence as Aging Badass with 2008’s Taken; the difference here is that Taken took viewers somewhere.

For Non-Stop’s first half, that vanilla tastes delicious enough, with Collet-Serra unapologetically building a high-stakes, high-altitude, high-gloss, high-concept whodunit — and whosdoingit — set in the unfriendly skies. Once the tone veers into action territory, vanilla’s generic nature seeps to the forefront, leaving viewers wishing more resided on the surface: chocolate sauce, gummy worms, butter brickle — hell, even granola! By then, the film loses all its fuel, drifting into a scenario so tired and seen-it-all-before, Non-Stop could be retitled Airport 2014.

While the studio-funded flick no doubt gave the great Julianne Moore (Boogie Nights) a paycheck a few zeroes above her usual indie gigs, the raise wasn’t accompanied by an opportunity to do anything but be Bill’s eventual arm dressing. Doomed to similar standing-’round status are The Strain’s Corey Stoll and, as the nervous-Nellie flight attendants, Michelle Dockery (TV’s Downton Abbey) and Lupita Nyong’o (then a newly minted Oscar winner for 12 Years a Slave). I won’t name the one supporting character who is given a hunk of meat to chew, because his casting proves detrimental — not because he’s a bad actor (because he isn’t), but because if you’re familiar with his filmography, the minute he appears is the minute you’ll think, “Oh, he did it.” And he did. —Rod Lott

Buy it at Amazon.

Random Genre & Cult Movie Reviews