The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) (2015)

humancentipedeIIIFrom the start of his highly peculiar and “100% medically accurate” franchise, writer/director/producer Tom Six promised that The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence) would make the previous two films appear tame. While I disagree with that statement — for sheer gross-outs, 2011’s The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence) still takes the urinal cake — Six has succeeded in making this concluding chapter as unique as II was to the 2009 original.

For this bitter-tasting end, Six goes meta, casting the madmen of parts I and II as the co-leads of III, albeit playing completely different characters who comment upon those movies and their mouth-to-anus concept as a hole. Er, excuse me: as a whole. All the action goes down (as it were) at Texas’ most inefficiently and ineffectively run penitentiary, the George H.W. Bush State Prison. That concrete jungle is ruled with a Teutonic fist by the vile, megalomaniacal Bill Boss (the first Centipede’s Dieter Laser, still channeling Christopher Walken and a lizard), a bald bully of a man who takes less pleasure in sexually harassing his secretary (porn star Bree Olson, Not Bill Cosby XXX: Puddin’ My Dick Where It Don’t Belong) than he does torturing his inmates: waterboarding, castration, breaking a guy’s “masturbation arm.”

humancentipedeIII1Boss’ predilection for abuse negatively impacts the facility’s medical budget, thus annoying its roly-poly accountant, Dwight (Laurence R. Harvey, Centipede II’s miserable copycat). As a solution toward solvency, Dwight pushes Boss to consider taking a cue from the Human Centipede films and build their own 500-prisoner version as “the ultimate deterrent.” Posits Dwight, “It’s brilliant! We don’t gotta deal with their shit no more. They just gotta deal with each others’.”

That the Centipede trilogy isn’t for everyone is an understatement, but its poopy-and-goopy reputation as irredeemable trash has been overstated by those who never have seen it, never planned to and never will. As abhorrent as you think them to be — and I’m not denying their explicitness in shock value, although more goes unseen than you’d expect — there’s an art to them. Really. And it does not lie beneath the surface, either.

In this capper, what Six — who plays himself, brought in to consult for the en masse surgical procedure — has amped up is not the red-and-brown gore, but the black comedy. Every minute of this Final Sequence is played for laughs as a post-Guantanamo satire of capital punishment, criminal rehabilitation, politics for profit and, to a lesser degree, meme culture. Whereas the first film actually showed remarkable restraint (believe it), going over-the-top is entirely Six’s point here. And the point is more than made; the message is impossible to miss. That it is told with jokes about stoma and Chron’s disease attached is … well, “brave” is one word for it.

With Final Sequence’s final sequence, the trilogy achieves closure, even if that leaves us with an infinite loop. And sew it goes … —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

The Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi (2003)

zatoichiThe Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi, Takeshi “Beat” Kitano’s brilliant update of the enduring Japanese cult hero, is quite an achievement — not just for the writer/director/actor, but contemporary Asian cinema as a whole. All too often in the continent’s genre pictures, arguably even more so than America’s dumbest rock-’em-sock-’em blockbusters, the story takes such a backseat to the action — if there’s even a story for starters — that it renders itself impenetrable or invisible.

With wave-of-the-hand ease, the 2003 Zatoichi could have done the same thing, lazily relying on its target audience’s fond memories of the character as shorthand (as he has no fewer than two dozen features built around him, starting with The Tale of Zatoichi in 1962 and later followed by a popular television series). Instead, Kitano (perhaps best known on these shores as the teacher of 2000’s Battle Royale) first infused the character with a real emotional pull and then fashioned a plot around it that fits as well as a sword in its custom sheath.

zatoichi1More or less homeless, the aging masseur Zatoichi wanders village to village, coming upon a farming community where he settles with a kind family. He soon finds enemies, however, at the local gambling parlor. As the title reveals, Zatoichi may be blind, but wields a mean sword — as swift as it is sharp — only when he needs to. And when he does, the combat is brief — a few seconds and it’s over; no massive, Kill Bill-style set pieces as showdowns to be found here.

What really makes this Blind Swordsman adventure work with Greenwich Mean Time precision is Kitano’s utterly charming and even funny performance. He’s wholly winning. I loved the film so much that even its decision to end in a musical number failed to change my mind. Hell, it even cemented it. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

My Name Is Modesty: A Modesty Blaise Adventure (2003)

mynamemodestyDespite toiling as a sexy spy, the comic-strip character Modesty Blaise never quite caught on in America. A 1966 movie based on Peter O’Donnell’s creation, Modesty Blaise, was made anyway, with Monica Vetti and Terence Stamp. It tanked.

A few decades later, Miramax had the great idea of reviving Blaise for an intended series of action-packed films; arbiter of pop-culture taste Quentin Tarantino agreed, hopping aboard as a producer. Whereas Natasha Henstridge and Reese Witherspoon were mentioned for the role, no one was cast until Miramax’s rights were due to expire. Only then did the indie studio rush a Romanian-lensed prequel into production. Shot in 18 days by Tarantino pal Scott Spiegel (From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money), it stars neither Henstridge nor Witherspoon, but the unknown (and, looking malnourished, unsexy) Alexandra Staden (Alexandra Staden, The Task). Is this any way to start a franchise?

mynamemodesty1The answer is, as My Name Is Modesty makes painfully clear, no. The string-beaned Modesty pulls double duty as a casino card dealer and bodyguard. When its owner is brutally murdered and the joint’s fully vested employees taken hostage by the killer Miklos (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Mama), Modesty keeps her cool and makes a wager with him. They play roulette, and whoever wins the round earns a reward: she, a released hostage; he, personal intel about Modesty.

This being fiction, Miklos has absolutely incredible luck at the wheel, as he wins nearly every spin. Thus, Modesty fills him in on her upbringing — cue the flashbacks! — as a filthy orphan saved by a kindly old professor (Fred Pearson, 1994’s Priest) who taught her reading and kung fuing.

Modesty and Miklos talk and talk and talk and talk. And talk! Then, at the movie’s tail end, some half-assed gunfire and utterly weak martial arts erupt. Sad to say, but this tiny film — one that, at just 78 minutes, barely qualifies as one — takes place in one room and sorely lacks action, suspense, espionage or intrigue. And yet the powers that be at Miramax still had the gall to subtitle it A Modesty Blaise Adventure. (To be fair, that four-word subtitle is 75 percent representative of the flick’s contents.)

The one-room set isn’t the only tip-off that Miramax didn’t shell out more than a pittance for this sluggish mess. Another big one is its look, bearing the drab visage of a syndicated TV action hour. Worse, with the generic music, the chintzy title sequence that incorporates scenes we’ll soon see, the questionably attractive actresses and the swarthy-looking muscular males, the secret-agent origin story threatens to turn into softcore Cinemax fare at any moment.

But don’t go looking for flesh. Her name is, after all, Modesty. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

How Star Wars Conquered the Universe: The Past, Present, and Future of a Multibillion Dollar Franchise

howstarwarsThink back to the beginning of summer 1999, when Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace was about to hit the American multiplex with the fervor of an Ebola outbreak: In just one of untold marketing tie-ins, everyone from Anakin Skywalker and Mace Windu to (shudder) Jar Jar Binks adorned specially designed cans of Pepsi — a lot of cans of Pepsi.

So many, in fact, that there were more of those cans on the market “than there were people on the planet,” according to Chris Taylor, author of How Star Wars Conquered the Universe. I share that statistic to let you know Taylor isn’t fooling around with his book’s title. George Lucas’ little 1977 tribute to the beloved Flash Gordon serials of his youth was so unloved by its own studio that embarrassed 20th Century Fox execs considered the “kiddie” movie second fiddle to the Sidney Sheldon adaptation they just knew would be the season’s surefire smash.

As we now know, it wasn’t. Instead, Star Wars was the film to which moviegoers flocked, making it the hit by far (and far, far away). From legitimizing science fiction as a box-office draw to making a mint off something called action figures, cinema was never the same. Before The Force Awakens this Christmas, you owe it to yourself to read how it came to be and what all it has done.

Now available from Basic Books in a trade-paperback edition that’s been expanded and revised to include information on that upcoming J.J. Abrams film, How Star Wars Conquered the Universe is not a rehash of countless making-of narratives. Had Taylor just stuck to telling that story, the book still would be good, because the way he tells it is unlike any I’ve read before. While he harbors reverence for the original trilogy, he’s not beholden to fan worship/service; Lucas’ early drafts are, with evidence, rightly dismissed as “ponderous,” and Taylor is able to remain his journalist’s objectivity: “We tend to go overboard with hindsight when examining the history of something successful. We build creation myths out of the creation of myth. The creator himself … is often more than happy to help in this deception.”

Where this project really succeeds is, again, in keeping with the book’s title. In every other chapter, Taylor examines in depth the franchise’s penetration into — if not impregnation of — our pop-culture consciousness. It’s one that exists even within people who never have seen the movies, and the initial chapter finds the author attempting to find a Star Wars virgin. Other side routes introduce the reader to cosplay groups, the unwitting viral-video star known as the “Star Wars Kid,” the cottage industry of Del Rey novels, Jedi as a religion, taking lightsaber-duel classes, the Kenner action figures, the parodies (including Ernie Fosselius’ still-brilliant Hardware Wars), the rip-offs (including Luigi Cozzi’s still-hysterical Starcrash) and the or-all-the-wrong-reasons-immortal Star Wars Holiday Special.

Its sheer comprehensiveness and galaxy-wide scope make it a must for lovers of film and, in particular, the business of film. Star Wars fanatics might be put off by the occasional brusqueness; no better example exists than marketer Charlie Lippincott’s recollection of his then-unique strategy of spreading word and prepping the masses by saturating comic-book conventions: “What I did led to something I’m appalled at.” I don’t take such comments as a negatives.

But the errors, certainly. Although Taylor writes in his new introduction that this 2.0 version corrects the boo-boos of last year’s hardback, some big ones were missed. Referenced on seven pages, special-effects pioneer Douglas Trumbull (2001: A Space Odyssey) is misspelled as “Trumball” every single time, and twice, Playboy founder Hugh Hefner somehow acquires an extra “F” in his last name. More than once, you’ll find the book’s very subject listed as “Stars Wars” — a perfectly understandable typo, but one easily remedied by a find/replace search in your friendly desktop/laptop word-processing program of choice.

Maybe the third edition will see those mistakes fixed, because we know with certainly that even after Lucas’ retirement, the story of Star Wars is far from over. One suspects it’s only just begun. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

Trick or Treat (1986)

trickortreatAt least one positive emerged from the heavy-metal hysteria of the ’80s: We got a pretty goofy movie satirizing the whole thing — albeit at featherweight — in Trick or Treat. Directed by actor Charles Martin Smith (1987’s The Untouchables), the schlocky Dino De Laurentiis production centers on the kind of misfit teen Smith became famous for playing in George Lucas’ American Graffiti. That 1973 film’s nerdy Toad may as well be this 1986 film’s Eddie.

But the part belongs to Marc Price, then still ripe in his second-banana role as Skippy on TV’s Family Ties. Eddie wouldn’t dare sit near Skippy on the bus, but both are outcasts all the same. Eddie’s attic room is practically wallpapered with posters of the hair-metal bands in which he finds escape from daily abuse by preppy bully Tim (Doug Savant, the token gay of TV’s Melrose Place), but outright worship is reserved for Satan-loving singer Sammi Curr (former Solid Gold dancer Tony Fields). Moments after writing Curr a gushing fan letter, which he signs “Ragman,” Eddie learns via the TV news that his idol has perished in a hotel fire. Bummed out, Eddie seeks solace in the local rock DJ (Kiss front man Gene Simmons, sans makeup), who gifts the boy with a valuable slab of vinyl: the only pressing of Curr’s Songs in the Key of Death.

trickortreat1Playing the record from “rock’s chosen warrior” backward, Eddie not only hears personal messages from Curr emanating through his stereo speakers — he summons him from the dead! With half his mug burned and blistered, but spiked mullet intact, the resurrected Curr looks like Two-Face for the Kerrang! set. At first he helps Eddie exact revenge through high-school high jinks, but quickly takes things too far; the best example gives us Trick or Treat’s most memorable scene: Tim’s girlfriend (Elise Richards, Valet Girls) being stripped, fondled and plateaued by green mist swirling from a Walkman playing Curr’s lost album on cassette. Is it live or is it Memorex? (The second most memorable bit is Savant’s near-tears line reading in the aftermath: “He put Genie in the hospital with his voodoo witchcraft! Or whatever the hell it is!” Trust me: You gotta be there.)

Bearing only a minimal connection to the title-tied holiday of Halloween, Trick or Treat aims for subversion by casting metal legend Ozzy Osbourne, a real-life target of the Parents Music Resource Center, as a man of the cloth preaching against the evils of rock ’n’ roll, yet the movie goes no further than that. All the time Smith and the script spent trying to turn Curr into the next Freddy Krueger (by way of Penelope Spheeris) should have been invested in making our supposed hero more than a petulant mouth-breather, coming up with more imaginative ways for Eddie and his crush (Lisa Orgolini, Born to Ride) to defeat Curr than the ol’ laundry hamper/flushed toilet combo, and writing a conclusion that wrapped up well before Trick enters a cycle of repetition — or, as the music industry calls it, heavy rotation. —Rod Lott

Get it at Amazon.

Random Genre & Cult Movie Reviews