Monsters (2010)

Have we become such a navel-gazing, irritatingly self-introspective, youth-fellating culture that we can’t even make a decent giant monster movie anymore? It started with Cloverfield, where, instead of a gargantuan beast destroying New York, we got a group of slick hipster jerks dodging debris, searching for a superficial “love” interest while talking about how much they loved Fraggle Rock while a gargantuan beast destroyed New York. Maybe. It’s kinda hard to tell because the thing was filmed on the modern-day equivalent of a handheld Fisher-Price PixelVision camera. It’s like a Nick Zedd movie with self-esteem.

Monsters director Gareth Edwards, luckily, invested in a tripod so we can at least see what is going on. Too bad what is going on are two insipid spring breakers stuck in Central America, trying to get home to Regular America, while gargantuan monsters are destroying the lush Mexican countryside. Maybe.

This is a great idea — the chance for an Americanized District 9 — but every time leads Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able open their mouths, it’s like listening to every single drunken conversation you’ve ever overheard around closing time at Señor Frog’s. Mumblecore for the frat crowd, finally! And the monsters? They’re barely seen extraterrestrials who crash-landed in Mexico a few years back — oversized, Old Gods-esque creatures that crush and destroy whole villages and, best of all, inspire heavy-handed allegories about illegal immigration.

It’s commendable that Edwards made Monsters for $800,000 and, because of it, he’s got the upcoming Godzilla remake gig, which is awesome. If there’s one way to top the 1998 Roland Emmerich atrocity, it’s making an ultra-talky redux of a legendary kaiju film. Were the Duplass brothers all booked up? Either way, I look forward to the inevitable Taco Bell tie-ins. I won at least 10 free bean burritos last time! —Louis Fowler

Buy it at Amazon.

4 thoughts on “Monsters (2010)”

  1. Well, no one can accuse me of being a biased editor. I can’t disagree with you more on this one. I *loved* it. Had I been able to see it in 2010, it would’ve made my year-end best list.

  2. I also Enjoyed this film more than Louis. A interesting take on an Aliens invasion by focusing on the after effect of the invasion and our inability to do anything about it. My oldest daughter tells me that it a film about immagration in the US complete with the Wall between Mexico and The US and it failure. I think that that a little more than the film maker intended. Stil a it a good film.

  3. I’ve read several interviews with Edwards (and Team McNairy/Able) that say the immigration subtext people are reading into it is completely unintentional.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *